Wright S, Dalal G, Vass C, Georgsson S, Payne K. How do women want to receive information about non-invasive prenatal testing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1377-89. doi: 10.1002/pd.6243
Buchanan J, Hill M, Vass CM, Hammond J, Riedijk S, Klapwijk JE, Harding E, Lou S, Vogel I, Hui L, Ingvoldstad-Malmgren C, Soller MJ, Ormond KE, Choolani M, Zheng Q, Chitty LS, Lewis C. Factors that impact on women's decision-making around prenatal genomic tests: an international discrete choice survey. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jun;42(7):934-46. doi: 10.1002/pd.6159
Wolowacz SE, Petrillo J, Doward LC, Briggs A. Measuring health-state utility values in clinical trials: can we do better? Ispor Connections. 2014 Sep;20(5):4-8.
Luciano JV, Barrada JR, Aguado J, Osma J, García-Campayo J. Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the HADS: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study in fibromyalgia patients. Psychological Assessment. 2014 Jun;26(2):395-406.
Stull DE, Houghton KF, Petrillo J. Innovative data analysis for demonstrating product value: analysis of heterogeneity in treatment response in clinical trials. Ispor Connections. 2013;19(1):5-8.
Masters E, Zlateva G, Harris NI. Real-world data for use in the real world: the pain paradigm. Ispor Connections. 2013;19(2):9-11.
Wolowacz SE, Khan SB. The New National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process: experience from the first completed appraisals. Ispor Connections. 2007;13(2):12-5.
Ryan M, Diack J, Watson V, Smith N. Rapid prenatal diagnostic testing for down syndrome only or longer wait for full karyotype: the views of pregnant women. Prenat Diagn. 2005 Dec;25(13):1206-11. doi: 10.1002/pd.1309
Mansfield CA. A consistent method for calibrating contingent value survey data. South Econ J. 1998;64(3):665-81.