Stull D, McBride D, Houghton K, Finlay A, Gnanasakthy A, Balp MM. Correlations between changes in urticaria activity score, dermatologic-related quality of life, and urticaria-specific quality of life: results from the Ph III trials of omalizumab in CIU/CSU patients. Poster presented at the American Academy of Dermatology 72nd Annual Meeting; March 21, 2015. Denver, CO.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether three patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments are equally informative about response to treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU). PRO instruments compared included: Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7 - measuring daily pruritus scores and number of hives summed over 7 days for a weekly score); Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (10-item PRO with one-week recall assessing the impact of skin disease); and Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) (23-item PRO with 2-week recall measuring urticaria-specific HRQoL by rating symptoms and their impact on aspects of life.)

METHODS: Data come from three phase 3 clinical trials investigating the effects of omalizumab for patients with CIU/CSU patient who remain symptomatic on H1-antihistamine treatment.. PRO data were collected at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, and 40 (ASTERIA I and GLACIAL), and baseline and weeks 4, 12, and 28 (ASTERIA II). Data were analysed using latent growth models (LGMs), irrespective of treatment. For each trial, correlations between changes in UAS7 and the other PROs were examined to investigate how closely dermatologic-related and urticaria-specific QoL changes mirrored symptom changes.

RESULTS: In all trials, mean UAS7 score was 30 out of 42, corresponding to a large effect on patient’s dermatologic-related HRQoL (DLQI mean score=12 out of 30) and above-median urticaria-specific HRQoL (CU-Q2oL median score=43 out of 100). Over the course of each trial, changes in symptom and HRQoL scores were evident [4-15 scale points, depending on PRO]. LGMs found changes in symptoms and HRQoL were highly correlated: 0.88, 0.85 and 0.88 (for each trial, respectively) between DLQI and UAS7; 0.94, 0.93 and 0.90 (for each trial, respectively) between CU-Q2oL and UAS7.

CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL (DLQI & CU-Q2oL) scores can provide an excellent indication of weekly UAS7 symptom scores and assessment of patient response to treatment. Results suggest that clinicians can have a choice of PRO instruments for assessing patient response to treatment.

Share on: