Whalley D, Balp MM, Yarr S, Korver D, Sauchelli Toran S, Kohli R, Orfanos P. Psychometric evaluation of the urticaria activity score in chronic spontaneous urticaria. Poster to be given at the ISPOR Europe 2024; November 17, 2024. Barcelona, Spain.


OBJECTIVES: The Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) comprises patient-reported items of itch severity and number of hives and is the criterion standard for assessing disease activity in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Data from twice-daily completion of the UAS in two phase 3 clinical trials were used to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of weekly scores derived from the measure.

METHODS: Initial pooled data over 12 weeks from two phase 3 trials in adults with CSU (REMIX-1[NCT05030311]) and REMIX-2[NCT05032157] were used for the analysis. Evaluations of weekly UAS (UAS7; 0-42), Itch Severity Score (ISS7; 0-21), and Hives Severity Score (HSS7; 0-21) included test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), construct validity and responsiveness correlations, and known-groups and responsiveness-groups analysis (analysis of variance). Supporting measures included Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; total score, score bands), and Urticaria Control Test 7-day recall.

RESULTS: The analysis sample included 889 patients (66.3% female; mean [standard deviation] age=43.4 [14.3] years). Scores were available for n=889 at baseline, n=882 at week 2, n=872 at week 4, and n=743 at week 12. Test-retest ICCs for scores at weeks 2 and 4 for patients with no change on PGIS and PGIC were ≥ 0.85. Convergent and responsiveness correlations with DLQI, UCT7, PGIS, and PGIC were ≥ 0.3. Differences (all P values < 0.0001) were found between groups based on DLQI, UCT7, PGIS, and rescue medication use at baseline, week 2, and/or week 12. Additionally, improved subgroups on the DLQI total score band, PGIS, and PGIC at weeks 2 and/or 12 had significantly greater improvements on the UAS7, ISS7, and HSS7.

CONCLUSIONS: The analyses confirmed the strong reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the UAS7, ISS7, and HSS7, supporting their use to assess treatment benefit in CSU clinical trials.

Share on: