Mansfield C, Sutphin J, Boeri M. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question. Health Econ. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-15. doi: 10.1002/hec.4124
Ensor CR, Iasella CJ, Harrigan (Zhang) KM, Morrell MR, Moore CA, Shigemura N, Zeevi A, McDyer JF, Venkataramanan R. Increasing tacrolimus time-in-therapeutic range is associated with superior one-year outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1527-33. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14723
Heidenreich S, Watson V, Ryan M, Phimister E. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems. Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524
Tsuchiya A, Watson V. Re-thinking “the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health". Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e103-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3480
Krucien N, Watson V, Ryan M. Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e1-e16. doi: 10.1002/hec.3459
Watson V, Becker F, de Bekker-Grob E. Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-7. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354
Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, Mills MJ, Belenko S, Dunlap LJ, Houser KA, Keyes V. Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):633-52.
Zarkin GA, Dunlap LJ, Hicks KA, Mamo D. Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Econ. 2005 Nov 1;14(11):1133-50.
Rivero E, Varas-Lorenzo C, Maguire AR, Eisen HJ, Pedersen TR, Nashan B, Elkammas E. 10-Year predicted probability of coronary heart disease in renal transplant recipients treated with everolimus or mmf. Poster presented at the American Transplant Congress; April 2002. Washington, DC. [abstract] Am J Transplant. 2002; 2(Suppl 3):418.